incite a riot
not really
Show Menu

generations

August 16, 2005   

I have no idea why, but my beloved friends and esteemed colleagues seem to believe that there is room for argument on the concept of what it means to be a first, second, or third generation American. Note that people also use the term first, second, or third generation immigrant to describe the same thing.

Ahem. No, there is no room for argument. I don’t say that because I think I’m right, so there! No, I say that because it is the truth. (So there! Hee!) My familiarity of the generation labels does not arise from some introspection and creative wordsmithing. The concepts of the generations are well-documented and accepted among those who study and write about immigration culture, in particular to the US. I have friends who insist I am wrong, but come on! You know you are just going with what you think sounds right, and not from knowledge of the accepted vernacular. I can’t just go around making things up about what I think “queer” or “neo-con” means based on what I feel; I must accept the normative use for these words and so must you!! Accept it! Take it! What’s my name?!!

Sorry.

Here is the breakdown:

  • First generation: This is the first generation in your family to move to and to live in America and/or become naturalized. This generation is born in and spent their formative years in a country that is not the US and often (but not always) self-identify their culture to be the one they were raised in, and not the American culture. They are often the ones to have made the decision to immigrate, and were not children that just went along with their parents. Often, but not always, the first generation does not speak English as a first language. Anyway, they are the first in the family to live in America and to become immersed in American culture, the first to have to try to adapt to the new country.
  • Second generation: This consists of the children of the first generationers. They are the first generation in their family to be born Americans, but their parents may already be naturalized, thus they are not the first generation Americans. This generation often suffers from a language gap with the parents and may not actually be able to communicate easily with each other (other than the normal parent-child thing). They grow up in a mixed culture — inside the home, it is very clear that they are in the culture of the parents’ origins, but outside of the home, they are true-blue Americans. While they are largely familiar with the superficial layers of their parents’ culture, they do not hold first-hand knowledge of the culture.
  • Third generation: This consists of the children of the second generationers (duh). Because they are raised by the second generationers who self-identify largely as plain old American, they often don’t learn any of the language or culture of grandparents, even if both parents are of the same ethnicity. They are Americans raised by Americans, and there is very little to distinguish them from anyone that’s been in the US for hundreds of years.

For the people who can’t take my word for it, here is a list of references:

Hmm, I didn’t know about the kibei:

There are also the Kibei, who are the same age as the Nisei and were born in America, but were schooled in Japan, arriving back in this country to live as adults.

Anyway… I fall into the gap between the first and second generation. I was born in Korea and spoke Korean as a first language and even attended school there for a bit. But I was still a small child when I moved to the US. My older brother was 12 years old and had attended up to the 6th grade in Korea, so he’s even further into this category. We are what are called the 1.5 generation.

It’s weird being 1.5 generation because we immigrated with our parents, yet because of exposure to school and peers, we learned the language faster than them. So we end up as translators for our parents and stand in for them when our younger siblings need help in school. It’s fine at my current age of 29, but for my older brother who had to deal with this most, it was not good at the age of 12. Most of my friends who are 1.5 generation grew up feeling like we were really Korean/Chinese/Cambodian/etc deep down inside, remembering the feeling of acceptance when we were kids and the shock of rejection when we moved to the US. Most of us were picked on by our peers and strangers in the streets for being different. But most of us also got a big awakening when/if we had a chance to visit the country we had considered home. It’s most definitely not home. We might have fond memories of the place, but we are like mutant aliens when we visit. We can barely get by with our American accents.

I struggled with issues of cultural identity as an adolescent, but I know where I am now. So this post isn’t really about that. I had to cut myself short when I realized where I was going. That’s just too boring, really. It’s just to clear it up for you peeps who dare to question my wisdom. Hee. Please don’t kick my ass.

8 Comments
Andre Alforque
August 16, 2005 at 3:50 pm

Yes, you are correct. You should really talk to my sister, the Sociology major. 😛 I always defer to her when I am confused about this because she had to get these terms straight for one of her researches. While all things are not so cut-and-dry (as you mentioned, the 1.5 generation); majority of immigrants fall into the whole number categories that you mentioned.

ei-nyung
August 16, 2005 at 9:21 pm

Come on, you know you are at least ivory. 😉

That’s seriously annoying of them. Either you know or you don’t, and people shouldn’t imply that you don’t know because you are white. It’s not like you haven’t met people/ever had friends/been interested in stuff other than being white.

A_B
August 17, 2005 at 9:51 am

Interesting that there is such a controversy over the numbers. Despite a large number of my peers would be considered “1.5ers”, I never have had either this discussion or, consequently, a dispute over the proper numbering.

My wife is 1.5 and is similar to the description (i.e., translator for the parents, etc.). I, on the otherhand, am like generation 20 on my mother’s side and 5 or 6 on my father’s side. My maternal great, great … great grandfather showed up in 1632. So all I have to say is, get offa’ my land you punks!

Jeremy
August 17, 2005 at 10:32 am

Fourth generation American on both sides here (almost across the board Norwegians) and is very interesting how quickly assimilation into a culture comes about. I have had no influence on life from that culture and my only family memory of anything even vaguely Norwegian is my grandfather eating lutefisk at Christmas when I was young. Yuck.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lutefisk

Jeremy
August 17, 2005 at 10:34 am

Correction. We still eat lefse on a regular basis when I am back home and it is good stuff.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lefse

ei-nyung
August 17, 2005 at 10:43 am

Lefse sounds good. I gotta try to find a good recipe.

Jeremy
August 17, 2005 at 11:38 am

From the wikipedia article…

“The most common is adding butter and sugar to the lefse and rolling it up.”

In my opinion, this is the ONLY way to eat it.

casacaudill
August 20, 2005 at 1:47 pm

My dad’s family has been here as long as they have cared to trace back the family tree. My grandpa’s family came from Germany sometime in the 1800s (I think) and my grandma’s family came from Ireland in the late 1800s to early1900s (I think). My great uncle went back to Ireland to retrace the family history and it was pretty interesting to see that at the time, they still had 2nd and 3rd cousins (even though they didn’t even know about each other).

I sometimes feel very sad to be this white bread American girl with no connection at all to my ancestry and no traditions or customs passed down.

The only thing I have remaining from either sides is a love of beer and a fiery temper.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *